DoneThat vs Insightful
Employee time tracking and productivity analytics.

Time Tracking Tools: side-by-side
These fall in three rough camps: Timesheets for billing, employee monitoring, and productivity. DoneThat focuses on the latter.
| Tool | Fully automated | Input data | Privacy‑first | Timesheets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy-first work tracker and AI coach Best for: Productivity-focused tracking without any work. | Yes | Screen-first for highest accuracy | Yes | CSV exports but not meant for billing |
Employee time tracking and productivity analytics. Best for: Companies needing workforce analytics and monitoring options. | Yes | Apps, websites, screenshots, workflow mapping | No — screenshots standard, recording an add-on | Yes, workforce analytics |
Insightful is best for
Companies needing workforce analytics and monitoring options.
DoneThat is best for
Productivity-focused tracking without any work.
Insightful: pricing and platforms
- Starting price
- $8 per seat per month billed annually (Workforce Analytics)
- Free tier
- No free plan; 7-day full-access trial
- Platforms
- Windows, macOS, Linux, Web
- Worth knowing
- Workflow Optimization is $12 per seat per month and the combined plan $16, a 20% saving on buying both. Add-ons stack: Workspace Security +$4, On-Demand Screenshots +$4, Increased Frequency Screenshots +$3, Screen Recording +$4, Data Warehouse Integrations +$0.50, all per seat per month. On-premise deployment requires 250+ seats.
Pricing as of , from Insightful's pricing page. Vendors change prices without notice, so check before you buy.
What Insightful does well
- Workflow mapping is genuinely differentiated — it measures how processes run, not just how long people were active.
- Cheapest entry point in the workforce-analytics group at $8 per seat per month billed annually.
- Combined plan at $16 saves 20% against buying analytics and workflow optimisation separately.
- Enterprise tier covers the things large organisations must have: audit logs, SSO, on-premise deployment.
- Runs on Windows, macOS and Linux, which is unusual for this category.
- 7-day trial with full access, so you evaluate everything rather than a cut-down tier.
Where Insightful falls short
- Screenshots are standard on every main plan, not optional.
- The add-on list is where the invasive capabilities live: screen recording, on-demand screenshots and higher-frequency screenshots are each a separate per-seat charge.
- Enterprise includes insider threat detection, which is explicitly surveillance of staff rather than productivity measurement.
- Real cost is usually well above the headline: $8 becomes $16 or more once add-ons are selected.
- Nothing in the product serves the tracked individual's understanding of their own work.
- No AI coach, no goal tracking, and no MCP server for AI assistants.
See the full time tracking tools comparison or visit Insightful.
The short answer
Insightful is workforce analytics with an add-on menu, and the add-on menu is where the interesting decisions are. Screenshots come as standard on every main plan; screen recording, on-demand screenshots and higher-frequency screenshots are each a separate per-seat charge; and the Enterprise tier includes insider threat detection.
DoneThat is the other design. No screenshot is ever stored, and the person doing the work is the person the data serves. If you are an employer who needs analytics about staff, Insightful is built for that. If you are a person who wants to understand your own week, almost none of this is aimed at you.
What Insightful does that others do not
Workflow mapping. This is the genuinely differentiated part. Rather than only measuring how long someone was active, it measures how a process runs — where work queues, where it stalls, how long a step takes. For an operations team trying to fix a process rather than assess a person, that is a more useful question than "what was the activity level?"
Linux support, which is rare in this category.
Enterprise infrastructure. Audit logs, SSO, on-premise deployment at 250+ seats. If your security team has a checklist, this clears it.
A 7-day full-access trial, so you see everything rather than an entry tier.
The add-on menu, plainly
As of 11 August 2026, per seat per month:
| Plan or add-on | Price |
|---|---|
| Workforce Analytics | $8 |
| Workflow Optimization | $12 |
| Both combined | $16 (20% saving) |
| Workspace Security | +$4 |
| On-Demand Screenshots | +$4 |
| Increased Frequency Screenshots | +$3 |
| Screen Recording | +$4 |
| Data Warehouse Integrations | +$0.50 |
Two observations worth making.
The headline is not the price. $8 is the entry figure; a configuration with the combined plan plus security plus screen recording is $24 per seat before anything else. Compare against what you will actually enable.
The add-ons tell you what the product is for. On-demand screenshots and increased screenshot frequency are not productivity analytics. They are surveillance capability, sold by the increment. Insider threat detection in the Enterprise tier is explicitly about identifying employees acting against the organisation — a security function, not a productivity one. None of that is hidden, and organisations buy it deliberately; it should just be named accurately rather than listed as a feature bullet.
DoneThat is subscription-based with a 14-day free trial; current prices are on the DoneThat download page.
The other model
For teams that want visibility without evidence-gathering:
- Dashboards on high-level summaries, not screenshot galleries.
- Relative trends shareable instead of absolute per-person hours.
- Visibility chosen per summary by the person it belongs to — private, team, org or public.
- Optional mood tracking, so the signal is burnout risk rather than activity volume.
- Screenshots are never stored. Processed in real time, immediately deleted; only derived structured activity persists. Excluded apps are redacted on your machine before anything is sent. With your own Gemini or OpenAI-compatible model, raw activity never reaches our servers. The desktop app is open source.
And the limit, stated honestly: this cannot prove anything about an individual to a third party, and it has no insider-threat function. Those are deliberate absences, which makes DoneThat the wrong tool if either is your requirement.
Platform support
| Insightful | DoneThat | |
|---|---|---|
| Windows | Yes | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | Yes | Yes |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile | No | No |
An even match, unusually.
Where Insightful is the better choice
- You are fixing a process, not assessing a person. Workflow mapping is the best reason to choose it.
- You need audit logs, SSO or on-premise.
- You need documented evidence about work you cannot observe.
- Data has to land in your warehouse. There is an integration add-on for it.
- Your security remit includes insider risk.
Where DoneThat is the better choice
- You are the person being tracked, and you picked the tool.
- You want to understand your work rather than have it assessed.
- You want coaching. Don nudges you onto goals, blocks calendar time, flags low-value work while you can still fix it, checks your mood, reminds you of meetings, suggests breaks.
- You want a team model that does not trade trust for visibility.
- You want AI tools to have your work history through MCP and an API.
- You want peer accountability rather than oversight. Follow others, share summaries, Slack and Discord, accountability groups — all opt-in.
- You want predictable pricing without an add-on matrix.
How we compared these
Everything stated about Insightful comes from its public pricing page, read on 11 August 2026 and linked below. The add-on prices are quoted directly from it.
Claims about DoneThat are first-hand: we build it. Insightful's workflow mapping is a capability we have no answer to, its enterprise infrastructure is stronger than ours, and its Linux support matches ours. The disagreement is about who the tool answers to.
Sources
AI-generated comparison
Prompt
Compare https://donethat.ai/ and https://www.insightful.io/ honestly. Check both websites yourself, then summarize where DoneThat is stronger and where Insightful is stronger. Do not rank them globally.
Result
DoneThat and Insightful both create visibility into work activity, but for different audiences. DoneThat is framed around user-controlled productivity coaching, while Insightful is framed around workforce analytics, monitoring, and operational productivity for companies.
DoneThat stronger
- Better fit when the buyer wants captured work history to become coaching, goals, and AI context instead of only a report.
- Lower-friction positioning for people who do not want to start timers, reconstruct their day manually, or write status notes.
- Broader AI workflow story around long-term memory, API, MCP, Zapier, n8n, and user control over what gets recorded and shared.
- Better fit when employee trust, user control, and personal coaching matter more than management monitoring.
Insightful stronger
- Stronger fit for organizations that need workforce analytics, monitoring, and productivity dashboards.
- More direct support for management use cases around distributed teams and operational oversight.
- Better match when screenshots, activity metrics, or compliance-style visibility are buying requirements.
Questions people ask about Insightful
- Does Insightful include screenshots?
- Yes, on every main plan. Beyond that, on-demand screenshots (+$4 per seat), increased screenshot frequency (+$3) and full screen recording (+$4) are sold as add-ons. There is no configuration of the main plans without screenshot capture.
- How much does Insightful actually cost?
- From $8 per seat per month billed annually for Workforce Analytics, $12 for Workflow Optimization, or $16 for both. Add-ons stack on top — Workspace Security $4, screen recording $4, on-demand screenshots $4, higher-frequency screenshots $3, data warehouse integrations $0.50 — so a realistic configuration lands well above the entry figure.
- What is insider threat detection?
- A capability in Insightful's Enterprise tier aimed at identifying employees who may be exfiltrating data or otherwise acting against the organisation. It is a security function rather than a productivity one, and it is worth knowing it is part of the platform if you are evaluating on privacy grounds.
- What is the less invasive alternative for a team?
- DoneThat's team model runs on high-level summaries rather than raw feeds, shares relative trends instead of per-person hours, lets each person set visibility on their own summaries, and never stores screenshots — they are processed in real time and immediately deleted. It cannot give an employer proof about an individual, which is deliberate.
Comparison last verified against Insightful's public materials on . DoneThat makes one of the products compared here; competitor claims are drawn from public sources and never from private data.
Ready to try DoneThat?
Fully automated AI time tracking and coaching. 14-day free trial.