Skip to main content
DoneThat

DoneThat vs Monitask

Time tracking with screenshots and activity logging.

By Don, DoneThat's AI coach · verified

Time Tracking Tools: side-by-side

These fall in three rough camps: Timesheets for billing, employee monitoring, and productivity. DoneThat focuses on the latter.

DoneThat vs Monitask comparison
ToolFully automatedInput dataPrivacy‑firstTimesheets
Privacy-first work tracker and AI coach
Best for: Productivity-focused tracking without any work.
YesScreen-first for highest accuracyYesCSV exports but not meant for billing
Time tracking with screenshots and activity logging.
Best for: Teams that want simple proof-of-work screenshots.
YesApps, websites, URLs, screenshotsNo — screenshots on every tierYes

Monitask is best for

Teams that want simple proof-of-work screenshots.

DoneThat is best for

Productivity-focused tracking without any work.

Monitask: pricing and platforms

Starting price
$5.32 per user per month billed annually (Pro), $6.49 billed monthly
Free tier
No free plan; 10-day free trial
Platforms
Windows, macOS, Linux, Web
Worth knowing
Business is $7.37 per user per month annually ($8.99 monthly) and Business Premium $10.65 ($12.99). Annual billing saves 18%. Website and app monitoring needs Business; full URL and page-level tracking needs Business Premium. Enterprise requires 100+ employees.

Pricing as of , from Monitask's pricing page. Vendors change prices without notice, so check before you buy.

What Monitask does well

  • Cheapest entry point in the monitoring group at $5.32 per user per month billed annually.
  • Simple, legible tier structure — three self-serve plans with clear differences rather than an add-on matrix.
  • Screenshots, activity monitoring and idle-time tracking on every tier, which is what buyers in this segment want.
  • 18% saving for annual billing, applied consistently across tiers.
  • Runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.
  • 10-day trial, and no seat minimum on the self-serve plans.

Where Monitask falls short

  • Screenshots are on every tier with no option to run without them.
  • Website and app monitoring requires Business, so the entry Pro tier is thinner than it looks.
  • Full URL and page-level tracking on Business Premium is page-by-page browsing history of your staff.
  • Productivity is inferred from internet and idle time — a presence metric, not a value one.
  • Nothing serves the tracked person: no coaching, no goals, no personal insight.
  • No AI layer and no MCP server, so history is not available to AI assistants.

See the full time tracking tools comparison or visit Monitask.

The short answer

Monitask is the cheap, straightforward end of employee monitoring: screenshots, activity levels and idle-time tracking from $5.32 per user per month. It does not pretend to be anything else, and there is something to be said for that clarity.

DoneThat is not a cheaper Monitask. It is a different product for a different buyer — the person doing the work rather than the person checking on them.

Pricing and what each tier gets you

As of 11 August 2026. Annual billing saves 18%.

PlanAnnualMonthlyAdds
Pro$5.32/user$6.49/userScreenshots, time tracking, activity and idle monitoring
Business$7.37/user$8.99/userWebsite and app monitoring
Business Premium$10.65/user$12.99/userFull URL and page-level tracking
EnterpriseCustomCustom100+ employees

10-day trial, no free plan, no seat minimum on the self-serve tiers.

The tier detail that matters: app and website monitoring is not in Pro. If the reason you are looking at Monitask is to see which applications your team uses, the relevant price is Business, not the $5.32 headline. And Business Premium's "full URL and page tracking" is page-by-page browsing history — worth naming for what it is rather than reading past as a feature bullet.

DoneThat is subscription-based with a 14-day free trial; current prices are on the DoneThat download page.

What it measures, and what that means

Monitask infers productivity from internet and idle time. That is a presence metric. It can tell you someone was at their keyboard; it cannot tell you whether the two hours produced anything.

Screenshots are on every tier, including the cheapest. There is no configuration of Monitask that does not capture them.

For the market it serves — hourly work, distributed teams, clients who want assurance — that is the product working as designed, and it is priced accordingly. It is also why it answers a different question from the one an individual asks about their own week.

The alternative model

If what you want from a team tool is shared signal rather than evidence:

  • Dashboards on high-level summaries, not screenshot feeds.
  • Relative trends shareable instead of absolute per-person hours, so the data supports a conversation rather than a ranking.
  • Visibility chosen per summary by the person it belongs to — private, team, org or public.
  • Optional mood tracking, so what a lead sees is burnout risk rather than activity volume.
  • Screenshots are never stored. Processed in real time, immediately deleted; only the derived structured activity persists. Excluded apps are redacted on your machine before anything is sent. With your own Gemini or OpenAI-compatible model, raw activity never reaches our servers. The desktop app is open source.

The trade is explicit: no proof of work. If a client contract requires documentation that someone was working, this model cannot supply it and Monitask can.

Platform support

MonitaskDoneThat
WindowsYesYes
macOSYesYes
LinuxYesYes
WebYesYes
MobileNoNo

Where Monitask is the better choice

  • You need cheap proof of work. Nothing in this comparison undercuts it meaningfully.
  • You pay hourly for work you cannot observe.
  • You want simple tiers. No add-on matrix to price.
  • You need page-level browsing visibility, and have a defensible reason for it.
  • You have no seat minimum tolerance. Self-serve tiers do not impose one.

Where DoneThat is the better choice

  • You are tracking yourself. Monitask's entire feature set assumes someone else is reading it.
  • You want to understand your work, not document it.
  • You want coaching. Don nudges you onto goals, blocks calendar time, flags low-value work while you can still fix it, checks your mood, reminds you of meetings, suggests breaks.
  • You want a team model that does not cost trust.
  • You want AI tools to have your work history through MCP and an API.
  • You want peer accountability rather than oversight. Follow others, share summaries, Slack and Discord, accountability groups — all opt-in.
  • You do not want screenshots to exist.

How we compared these

Everything stated about Monitask comes from its public pricing page, read on 11 August 2026 and linked below. Claims about DoneThat are first-hand: we build it.

Monitask is cheaper than we are and matches our platform coverage; both are stated plainly. We have described its monitoring features as capabilities buyers deliberately choose rather than as a scandal — the disagreement is about who the tool is for.

AI-generated comparison

Prompt

Compare https://donethat.ai/ and https://www.monitask.com/en/ honestly. Check both websites yourself, then summarize where DoneThat is stronger and where Monitask is stronger. Do not rank them globally.
Try yourself

Result

DoneThat and Monitask both capture work activity, but Monitask is more proof-of-work oriented while DoneThat is more productivity-coaching and AI-context oriented.

DoneThat stronger

  • Better fit when the buyer wants captured work history to become coaching, goals, and AI context instead of only a report.
  • Lower-friction positioning for people who do not want to start timers, reconstruct their day manually, or write status notes.
  • Broader AI workflow story around long-term memory, API, MCP, Zapier, n8n, and user control over what gets recorded and shared.
  • Better fit for individuals or teams that do not want screenshot-centered accountability.

Monitask stronger

  • Stronger fit when managers need screenshots, activity tracking, and straightforward proof-of-work records.
  • More direct match for remote teams that need simple employee monitoring.
  • Better fit when billing or attendance evidence matters more than personal coaching.

Questions people ask about Monitask

How much does Monitask cost?
As of 11 August 2026: Pro $5.32 per user per month billed annually ($6.49 monthly), Business $7.37 ($8.99), Business Premium $10.65 ($12.99). Annual billing saves 18%. There is a 10-day trial, no free plan, and Enterprise requires 100+ employees.
Does Monitask take screenshots?
Yes, on every tier including Pro — automatic screenshot capture is core to the product. DoneThat never stores screenshots: they are processed in real time and immediately deleted, with only the derived structured activity kept.
What do I lose on the cheapest Monitask plan?
Website and app monitoring, which needs Business, and full URL and page-level tracking, which needs Business Premium. Pro gives you screenshots, time tracking and activity or idle monitoring — so if app-level visibility is why you are buying, price Business rather than Pro.
Is there an alternative that does not screenshot my team?
DoneThat's team model runs on high-level summaries rather than raw feeds, shares relative trends instead of per-person hours, and lets each person set visibility on their own summaries, with optional mood tracking so the signal is burnout risk rather than activity volume. It cannot produce proof-of-work evidence, which is the trade.

Comparison last verified against Monitask's public materials on . DoneThat makes one of the products compared here; competitor claims are drawn from public sources and never from private data.

Ready to try DoneThat?

Fully automated AI time tracking and coaching. 14-day free trial.