DoneThat vs OpenAI Chronicle

Name: OpenAI Chronicle
Brand: OpenAI Chronicle

Codex feature that builds memory from recent screen context.

AI Memory: side-by-side

Tools to archive your digital life and make it available for later use by eg AIs.

DoneThat vs OpenAI Chronicle comparison
Tool	Input data	Platform support	Data location	API
DoneThat Privacy-first work tracker and AI coach Best for: Calendar-like timeline of your work.	Screen, audio, apps	macOS, Windows, Linux	Cloud	Yes
OpenAI Chronicle Codex feature that builds memory from recent screen context. Best for: Codex users on macOS who want screen-aware memory while they work.	Screen context	macOS	Hybrid	-No

OpenAI Chronicle is best for

Codex users on macOS who want screen-aware memory while they work.

DoneThat is best for

Calendar-like timeline of your work.

See the full ai memory comparison or visit OpenAI Chronicle.

AI-generated comparison

Generated 2026-06-12DoneThat home page OpenAI Chronicle home page

Prompt

Compare https://donethat.ai/ and https://openai.com/index/codex-for-almost-everything/ honestly. Check both websites yourself, then summarize where DoneThat is stronger and where OpenAI Chronicle is stronger. Do not rank them globally.

Try yourself

ChatGPT

Claude

Perplexity

Result

DoneThat and the OpenAI Codex update solve different problems: DoneThat is a cross-platform automatic time-tracking and AI productivity coach aimed at knowledge workers who want their day reconstructed and reviewed, while the Codex page describes an expanded coding agent for developers that operates the computer, runs across the software-development lifecycle, and carries work forward over days or weeks. DoneThat wins on transparent pricing, platform breadth, and a clear time-tracking/coaching outcome; the Codex update wins on agentic execution depth, an ecosystem of developer integrations, and persistent long-running task automation.

DoneThat stronger

Publishes concrete tiered pricing ($4, $8, $16/month with a 14-day trial) right on the page, while the Codex post ties access to a ChatGPT sign-in without showing what that costs.
Ships a desktop app on Windows, Mac, and Linux, whereas the Codex computer-use capability is initially limited to macOS with EU and UK rollout coming later.
Targets a broad audience of knowledge workers (PMs, ops, freelancers, nonprofits) rather than the 3M+ developer audience Codex explicitly addresses.
Leads with a tangible, quantified outcome ('23h/week' reclaimed via automated timesheets, coaching, and reduced meetings) instead of capability descriptions.
Highlights privacy posture and open-source desktop components plus user-controlled data sharing, which the Codex page does not address.

OpenAI Chronicle stronger

Describes a far more agentic product: Codex can see, click, and type in any app, run multiple agents in parallel on the Mac, and operate an in-app browser for frontend work.
Ships 90+ plugins and named integrations (Atlassian Rovo, JIRA, CircleCI, CodeRabbit, GitLab, Microsoft Suite, Neon, Render, Slack, Gmail, Notion) versus DoneThat's shorter list of generic connectors (API, MCP, Zapier, n8n).
Covers the full software-development lifecycle in one workspace, including PR review, multi-terminal, SSH to remote devboxes, and rich previews for PDFs, spreadsheets, and slides.
Offers genuinely long-running automations that schedule future work and wake themselves up to continue tasks across days or weeks, beyond DoneThat's daily/weekly review cadence.
Backed by OpenAI's distribution, model access (including gpt-image-1.5 for in-workflow image generation), and a stated user base of more than 3 million weekly developers, which signals maturity DoneThat does not claim.

Ready to try DoneThat?

Fully automated AI time tracking and coaching. 14-day free trial.