DoneThat vs Time Doctor
Employee time tracking with productivity and attendance reporting.

Time Tracking Tools: side-by-side
These fall in three rough camps: Timesheets for billing, employee monitoring, and productivity. DoneThat focuses on the latter.
| Tool | Fully automated | Input data | Privacy‑first | Timesheets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy-first work tracker and AI coach Best for: Productivity-focused tracking without any work. | Yes | Screen-first for highest accuracy | Yes | CSV exports but not meant for billing |
Employee time tracking with productivity and attendance reporting. Best for: Distributed teams needing detailed workforce analytics. | Yes, with manual timers | Apps, URLs, screenshots, screen recording | No — screenshots all tiers, recording on Premium | Yes, plus payroll |
Time Doctor is best for
Distributed teams needing detailed workforce analytics.
DoneThat is best for
Productivity-focused tracking without any work.
Time Doctor: pricing and platforms
- Starting price
- Four tiers — Basic, Standard, Premium and Enterprise — priced per user per month
- Free tier
- No free plan; two weeks of free access to all Premium features
- Platforms
- Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Web, Browser extension
- Worth knowing
- Annual billing gives two months free, a 16.6% discount on the monthly rate. Exact figures are not published as text on the pricing page. Capability is tiered: screenshots on every plan, web and app monitoring plus productivity ratings from Standard, screen recording from Premium. Enterprise needs 50+ users for a dedicated account manager.
Pricing as of , from Time Doctor's pricing page. Vendors change prices without notice, so check before you buy.
What Time Doctor does well
- Thorough proof-of-work toolkit: screenshots on every tier, screen recording on Premium, web and app monitoring, productivity ratings.
- Built for scale — designed around BPOs, outsourcing and distributed hourly teams.
- Broad platform coverage including mobile and browser extensions.
- Two-week trial with full access to Premium features, so you evaluate the top tier rather than the entry one.
- Annual billing is a clear 16.6% saving, equivalent to two months free.
- Productivity ratings give managers a single number to act on, which is what many buyers want.
Where Time Doctor falls short
- Screenshots are included on every tier, so there is no configuration of Time Doctor without them.
- Screen recording on Premium is the most invasive capability in this comparison.
- Productivity ratings score presence and input rather than the value of the work.
- Exact prices are not published as text, making comparison awkward before a sales conversation.
- Nothing in the product serves the tracked individual's understanding of their own work.
- No AI coaching, no goal tracking, and no MCP server for AI assistants.
See the full time tracking tools comparison or visit Time Doctor.
The short answer
Time Doctor is the most thorough proof-of-work tool in this comparison. Screenshots are on every tier, screen recording arrives at Premium, and productivity ratings give a manager a single number per person.
DoneThat is the opposite design. It never stores a screenshot, and the person being tracked is the person the data is for. If you need evidence about someone else's work, Time Doctor is built for that and we are not. If you need to understand your own, the reverse.
What each tier actually includes
This matters more than the price, because the capability that concerns people is not optional.
| Capability | Basic | Standard | Premium | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screenshots | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Activity tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Web and app monitoring | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Productivity ratings | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Screen recording | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Note the first row: there is no Time Doctor configuration without screenshots. They are in Basic. If you were hoping to adopt it in a lighter mode, that mode does not exist.
When Time Doctor is the right tool
You run a BPO or an outsourced team. This is the market it is built for, and it serves it well. When a client is paying for hours delivered by people they will never meet, documentary evidence is part of the contract.
You need proof, not signal. Screenshots and recordings are evidence. Summary-level data is not, and no amount of design changes that.
Hourly pay depends on verified time. The pipeline from tracked hours to payroll is mature.
A single productivity number is what your managers want. Ratings are crude, but they are actionable at scale in a way that nuanced data is not.
You want to evaluate the top tier first. The two-week trial gives full access to Premium features rather than the entry plan, which is unusually honest as trials go.
How the tracking works
Time Doctor runs automatic capture — activity, apps, URLs and screenshots — and also supports manual timers for attributing work to specific tasks or projects. The automatic layer is the one that matters in practice: it is what makes the record independent of whether the tracked person remembers to start anything.
DoneThat has no timer at all; the day is reconstructed from capture and you review it.
What the design costs
Productivity ratings score inputs. They reward steady typing and clicking. Thinking, reading, whiteboarding and talking to a colleague all score badly, and everyone measured this way works it out within a fortnight. The behaviour that follows is well documented and is not more productivity.
Screen recording is the most invasive capability here. It is a legitimate product decision and some contracts require it. It is also worth naming plainly rather than listing among features.
None of it is for the tracked person. A Time Doctor user sees their own compliance. They do not get told that a recurring meeting has eaten nine hours this week — the product is not asking that question.
Pricing
As of 11 August 2026, Time Doctor does not publish per-user figures as text on its pricing page. What is published: four tiers priced per user per month, annual billing giving two months free — a 16.6% discount, a two-week trial with full Premium access, and Enterprise requiring 50+ users for a dedicated account manager.
We are not quoting dollar figures we cannot verify from the source.
DoneThat is subscription-based with a 14-day free trial; current prices are on the DoneThat download page.
The alternative model, stated precisely
For teams that want visibility without evidence-gathering:
- Dashboards built on high-level summaries, not screenshot galleries or recordings.
- Relative trends shareable instead of absolute per-person hours.
- Visibility chosen per summary by the person it belongs to — private, team, org or public.
- Optional mood tracking, so the signal a lead receives is burnout risk rather than activity volume.
- Screenshots are never stored. Processed in real time, immediately deleted; only the derived structured activity persists. Excluded apps are redacted on your machine before anything is sent. With your own Gemini or OpenAI-compatible model, raw activity never reaches our servers. The desktop app is open source.
The limit of this model, stated honestly: it cannot prove anything to a third party. That is deliberate, and it makes DoneThat the wrong tool for a client contract that requires documentation.
Platform support
| Time Doctor | DoneThat | |
|---|---|---|
| Desktop | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Mobile | iOS, Android | No |
| Web app | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | Yes | No |
Where Time Doctor is the better choice
- You need documentary proof of work for a client, an auditor or a contract.
- You run outsourced or hourly teams at scale.
- Payroll depends on verified hours.
- Managers want a single productivity number per person.
- You need mobile.
Where DoneThat is the better choice
- You are the one being tracked, and you chose the tool.
- You want to understand your work rather than document it.
- You want coaching. Don nudges you onto goals, blocks calendar time, flags low-value work while you can still fix it, checks your mood, reminds you of meetings, suggests breaks.
- You want a team model that does not damage trust.
- You want AI tools to have your work history through MCP and an API.
- You want peer accountability rather than oversight. Follow others, share summaries, Slack and Discord, accountability groups — all opt-in.
- You do not want screenshots or recordings to exist.
How we compared these
Everything stated about Time Doctor comes from its public pricing page, read on 11 August 2026 and linked below. The tier feature matrix above is taken directly from it. Prices are not quoted because they are not published there as text.
Claims about DoneThat are first-hand: we build it. Time Doctor covers more platforms than we do, its trial is more generous in what it unlocks, and for the job it is built for — evidence — it is effective and we are not a substitute. Our disagreement is about which problems are worth solving that way, not about whether the product works.
AI-generated comparison
Prompt
Compare https://donethat.ai/ and https://www.timedoctor.com/ honestly. Check both websites yourself, then summarize where DoneThat is stronger and where Time Doctor is stronger. Do not rank them globally.
Result
DoneThat and Time Doctor both capture time and activity, but Time Doctor is built around employee time tracking and workforce analytics while DoneThat is positioned around user-centered AI coaching.
DoneThat stronger
- Better fit when the buyer wants captured work history to become coaching, goals, and AI context instead of only a report.
- Lower-friction positioning for people who do not want to start timers, reconstruct their day manually, or write status notes.
- Broader AI workflow story around long-term memory, API, MCP, Zapier, n8n, and user control over what gets recorded and shared.
- Better fit when the team wants productivity support without leading with monitoring.
Time Doctor stronger
- Stronger fit for distributed teams needing attendance, productivity, and workforce reporting.
- More direct support for management-oriented time tracking and activity analytics.
- Better match when payroll, proof-of-work, or employee oversight is central.
Questions people ask about Time Doctor
- Can I use Time Doctor without screenshots?
- Screenshots are listed on every tier including Basic, so they are part of the product rather than an upgrade. Screen recording is added at Premium. If you want automatic tracking with no screenshot capture at all, that is a different category of tool.
- What does each Time Doctor tier add?
- Screenshots and activity tracking are on all four tiers. Standard adds web and app monitoring plus productivity ratings. Premium adds screen recording. Enterprise adds custom terms, with a dedicated account manager from 50+ users.
- How much does Time Doctor cost?
- Exact per-user figures are not published as text on the pricing page as of 11 August 2026. What is published: four tiers priced per user per month, annual billing giving two months free (a 16.6% discount), and a two-week trial with full access to Premium features.
- Is there a less invasive alternative for teams?
- If the goal is shared team signal rather than proof of work: DoneThat's dashboards run on high-level summaries, teams can share relative trends instead of per-person hours, each person controls visibility on their own summaries, and screenshots are never stored — they are processed in real time and immediately deleted. If you genuinely need evidence to show a client or an auditor, Time Doctor does that and DoneThat does not.
Comparison last verified against Time Doctor's public materials on . DoneThat makes one of the products compared here; competitor claims are drawn from public sources and never from private data.
Ready to try DoneThat?
Fully automated AI time tracking and coaching. 14-day free trial.